![]() With 8 touch-sensitive, motorized, 100 mm faders and 57 buttons covering 78 different functions, you can quickly zoom in on audio files for editing, adjust your click-track tempo with a simple tap, modify plug-in parameters, manage aux mixes-and, of course, control track levels with the touch of a finger. Now the only tasks I need to resort to my mouse and keyboard are creating new tracks and routing and loading/saving/exporting sessions.” – Advanced, Innovative DAW Control FaderPort 8: 8-channel Mix Production Controller Don’t kill that mouse-give it a companion.Īlthough a keyboard and mouse are tried-and-true DAW-control devices, they’re far more effective when used in tandem with the FaderPort™ 8’s precise tactile control over mix and automation functions. It’s built pretty solidly, it’s a very clean and clear overall interface… The Faderport 8 focuses on what I need. It gives your mouse and keyboard a real break and allows you to give more focus on recording and mixing and less to programming. Like anything there's a learning curve, but with all the YouTube videos available today, all you have to do is ask the right question.“A classy motorised console controller… particularly well-suited to Pro Tools… The integration is slick, smooth, intuitive and, above all, useful.” – Robin Vincent, Sound On Sound “So first off, this really is a 5 star product… What makes this greater than the sum of it’s parts is just what a huge difference in workflow it can make for you. Anyhow, I've always loved the intuitive workflow, that for me just works. I've seen 50-100 free things with some of the Free Updates. I then bought a PreSonus interface that included the Free Version of StudioOne (Artist) I then moved to Studio One Professional, and the free stuff they through in with some of their updates is at times staggering. the "faders" moving horizontally just didn't look right to any mixer I'd ever been on. Did my first few recordings with it., but never liked the layout. I started on Reaper, looked at Audacity, and then bought a Mac mainly because of GarageBand. Remember, every DAW, out of the gate, all we need to learn is how to arm a track with the proper input device, make sure we are not overdriving the input signal and then hit the red button and go ! Everything else we add if and when we need it. Studio One uses some different terminology but I believe Pro Tools users can sit in the Studio One Drivers seat in just a few minutes. The workflows are very similar and to me make very good sense. ![]() Lee - Recordings - Breathe - D6th - Videoīob, while I am a Pro Tools user, if I had to move to another DAW it would be Studio One. Thanks again for the feedback and encouragement. They haven't updated their audio interface unit since 2013 (USB-2 - 8 ms latency ), and the V-Studio 2000-CD was the last model of the series. ![]() ![]() It seems that Roland has dropped out of the race, though. Until now, my multi-track recordings have all been on Roland V-Studio hardware. GarageBand - not really made for musicians. ![]() Studio One looks like a very good DAW, and the fact that several of you are using it professionally is encouraging to me. I used a Behringer mixer for my mics on Stella. I'm as wary of Behringer as he is of PreSonus. I'm going to buy it but, mindful of Jack Stoner's advise, I'll put it through all of its paces to make sure it's not defective. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |